freshwater: be valuable resource to canadians

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents habitat
Weight: 0.65
, organism
Weight: 0.64
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.51
, issue
Weight: 0.49
, resource
Weight: 0.49
Siblings wetland
Weight: 0.36
, diatom
Weight: 0.35
, algae
Weight: 0.35
, alga
Weight: 0.35
, marsh
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be valuable resource to canadians 1.00
is important resource 0.85
is natural resource 0.80
has quality resource 0.80
is limited resource 0.78
is limited natural resource 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(freshwater, is natural resource)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(freshwater, is limited resource)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(freshwater, is important resource)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(freshwater, has quality resource)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(freshwater, is limited natural resource)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(freshwater, is natural resource)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(freshwater, is limited resource)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(freshwater, is limited resource)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(freshwater, is important resource)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(freshwater, is important resource)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(freshwater, is natural resource)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(freshwater, has quality resource)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(freshwater, is limited natural resource)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(freshwater, has quality resource)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(freshwater, is limited natural resource)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, is important resource)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, is limited resource)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, has quality resource)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, is natural resource)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, is limited natural resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)