freshwater: have thermal inertia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents habitat
Weight: 0.65
, organism
Weight: 0.64
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.51
, issue
Weight: 0.49
, resource
Weight: 0.49
Siblings wetland
Weight: 0.36
, diatom
Weight: 0.35
, algae
Weight: 0.35
, alga
Weight: 0.35
, marsh
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have thermal inertia 1.00
have high thermal inertia 0.99
have inertia 0.88
have high inertia 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(freshwater, have thermal inertia)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(freshwater, have thermal inertia)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(freshwater, have thermal inertia)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, have high thermal inertia)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(freshwater, have thermal inertia)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(freshwater, have high thermal inertia)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(freshwater, have thermal inertia)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(freshwater, have high thermal inertia)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(freshwater, have thermal inertia)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(freshwater, have inertia)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(freshwater, have thermal inertia)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(freshwater, have inertia)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(freshwater, have thermal inertia)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, have inertia)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(freshwater, have thermal inertia)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, have high inertia)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(freshwater, have thermal inertia)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(freshwater, have high inertia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(freshwater, have thermal inertia)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(freshwater, have high inertia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(freshwater, have thermal inertia)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(freshwater, have high thermal inertia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(freshwater, have thermal inertia)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(freshwater, have inertia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(freshwater, have thermal inertia)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(freshwater, have high inertia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(freshwater, have thermal inertia)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(freshwater, have thermal inertia)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, have thermal inertia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(freshwater, have thermal inertia)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(freshwater, have thermal inertia)