frog: be called amphibian

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reptile
Weight: 0.78
, creature
Weight: 0.72
, tree frog
Weight: 0.65
, amphibian
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.64
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.40
, turtle
Weight: 0.39
, toad
Weight: 0.39
, saltwater crocodile
Weight: 0.38
, otter
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called amphibian 1.00
is amphibian 0.99
be in amphibian group 0.97
be called amphibians 0.85
is amphibians 0.83
attract frog of species 0.83
be considered amphibians 0.82
be called frogs 0.82
attract frog of same species 0.82
be said amphibians 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(amphibian, be called amphibians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(frog, be called amphibian)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(amphibian, be called amphibians)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be called amphibians)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(toad, is amphibians)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(amphibian, be called amphibians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(frog, be called amphibian)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(toad, is amphibians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(toad, is amphibians)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(frog, be called amphibian)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(frog, is amphibian)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(frog, is amphibian)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(frog, be called amphibians)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(frog, is amphibian)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(frog, be considered amphibians)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(frog, is amphibian)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(frog, is amphibians)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(frog, be considered amphibians)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(frog, be called amphibians)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(frog, is amphibians)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(frog, is amphibians)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(frog, be considered amphibians)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(frog, be called amphibians)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(frog, is amphibians)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(frog, be considered amphibians)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(frog, be called amphibians)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(frog, be called amphibian)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(frog, be called amphibian)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(amphibian, be called amphibians)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(toad, is amphibians)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(frog, be called amphibian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(amphibian, be called amphibians)