frog: be called amphibians

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reptile
Weight: 0.78
, creature
Weight: 0.72
, tree frog
Weight: 0.65
, amphibian
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.64
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.40
, turtle
Weight: 0.39
, toad
Weight: 0.39
, saltwater crocodile
Weight: 0.38
, otter
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called amphibians 1.00
is amphibians 0.99
be considered amphibians 0.98
be different from amphibians 0.96
be said amphibians 0.96
be know as amphibians 0.96
be classified as amphibians 0.94
be different from other amphibians 0.94
belong to amphibians 0.93
be amphibians in australia 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(frog, be called amphibians)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(frog, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(amphibian, be called amphibians)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(frog, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be called amphibians)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(frog, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(toad, is amphibians)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(frog, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(frog, be called amphibians)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(frog, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(toad, is amphibians)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(toad, is amphibians)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(frog, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(frog, be called amphibians)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(frog, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(frog, is amphibians)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(frog, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(frog, be considered amphibians)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(frog, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(frog, is amphibians)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(frog, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(frog, be considered amphibians)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(frog, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(frog, be considered amphibians)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(frog, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(frog, be considered amphibians)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(frog, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(frog, is amphibians)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(frog, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(frog, is amphibians)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(frog, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(frog, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(frog, be called amphibians)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(frog, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(frog, be called amphibians)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(frog, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(amphibian, be called amphibians)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(frog, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(toad, is amphibians)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(frog, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(amphibian, be called amphibians)