frog: has bone

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reptile
Weight: 0.78
, creature
Weight: 0.72
, tree frog
Weight: 0.65
, amphibian
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.64
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.40
, turtle
Weight: 0.39
, toad
Weight: 0.39
, saltwater crocodile
Weight: 0.38
, monkey
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has bone 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(frog, has bone)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(lizard, has bone)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(frog, has bone)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(lizard, has bone)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(lizard, has bone)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(frog, has bone)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(frog, has bone)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(frog, has bone)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(frog, has bone)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(frog, has bone)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(frog, has bone)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(frog, has bone)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(frog, has bone)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(lizard, has bone)