frog: have sticky tongues

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reptile
Weight: 0.78
, creature
Weight: 0.72
, tree frog
Weight: 0.65
, amphibian
Weight: 0.64
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.40
, turtle
Weight: 0.39
, toad
Weight: 0.39
, saltwater crocodile
Weight: 0.38
, otter
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have sticky tongues 1.00
has physical part tongues 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(frog, have sticky tongues)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(frog, have sticky tongues)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(frog, have sticky tongues)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(frog, has physical part tongues)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(frog, have sticky tongues)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part tongues)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(frog, have sticky tongues)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part tongues)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(frog, have sticky tongues)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part tongues)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(frog, have sticky tongues)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(frog, have sticky tongues)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(frog, have sticky tongues)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(frog, have sticky tongues)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(frog, have sticky tongues)