frog: mate in water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reptile
Weight: 0.78
, creature
Weight: 0.72
, tree frog
Weight: 0.65
, amphibian
Weight: 0.64
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.40
, turtle
Weight: 0.39
, toad
Weight: 0.39
, saltwater crocodile
Weight: 0.38
, otter
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
mate in water 1.00
mate 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(amphibian, mate)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(frog, mate in water)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(frog, mate in water)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(amphibian, mate)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(frog, mate in water)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, mate)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(frog, mate in water)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(toad, mate in water)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(frog, mate in water)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(turtle, mate)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(frog, mate in water)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(otter, mate)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(amphibian, mate)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(frog, mate in water)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(frog, mate in water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(frog, mate in water)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(toad, mate in water)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(toad, mate in water)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(frog, mate in water)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(otter, mate)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(otter, mate)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(frog, mate in water)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(turtle, mate)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(turtle, mate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(frog, mate in water)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(frog, mate in water)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(frog, mate in water)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(frog, mate)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(frog, mate in water)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(frog, mate)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(frog, mate in water)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(frog, mate)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(frog, mate in water)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(frog, mate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(frog, mate in water)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(frog, mate in water)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(frog, mate in water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(frog, mate in water)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(frog, mate in water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(frog, mate in water)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(amphibian, mate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(frog, mate in water)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(toad, mate in water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(frog, mate in water)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(otter, mate)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(frog, mate in water)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(turtle, mate)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(frog, mate in water)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(amphibian, mate)