frog: survive in wild

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reptile
Weight: 0.78
, creature
Weight: 0.72
, tree frog
Weight: 0.65
, amphibian
Weight: 0.64
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.40
, turtle
Weight: 0.39
, toad
Weight: 0.39
, saltwater crocodile
Weight: 0.38
, otter
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
survive in wild 1.00
survive in winter 0.82
survive in rainforest 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(frog, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(frog, survive in wild)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(frog, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(frog, survive in rainforest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(frog, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(frog, survive in rainforest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(frog, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(frog, survive in rainforest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(frog, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(frog, survive in rainforest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(frog, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(frog, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(frog, survive in wild)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(frog, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(frog, survive in wild)