front door: is designs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents door
Weight: 0.87
, window
Weight: 0.78
, barn door
Weight: 0.76
, doorway
Weight: 0.69
Siblings transom
Weight: 0.46
, rear window
Weight: 0.41
, gate
Weight: 0.37
, window pane
Weight: 0.37
, refrigerator
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is designs 1.00
is design 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(door, is design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(front door, is designs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(front door, is designs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(door, is design)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(front door, is designs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(door, is design)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(door, is design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(front door, is designs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(front door, is designs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(front door, is designs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(front door, is designs)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(front door, is designs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(front door, is design)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(front door, is designs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(front door, is design)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(front door, is designs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(front door, is design)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(front door, is designs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(front door, is design)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(front door, is designs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(front door, is designs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(front door, is designs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(front door, is designs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(front door, is designs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(front door, is designs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(door, is design)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(front door, is designs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(door, is design)