frostbite: be like burn

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.67
, injury
Weight: 0.62
, danger
Weight: 0.58
, problem
Weight: 0.58
, risk
Weight: 0.55
Siblings dehydration
Weight: 0.35
, sunburn
Weight: 0.35
, pneumonia
Weight: 0.34
, rheumatic fever
Weight: 0.34
, amputation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be like burn 1.00
is burn 0.96
burn 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(frostbite, be like burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sunburn, burn)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(frostbite, be like burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(sunburn, burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(sunburn, burn)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(frostbite, be like burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(frostbite, be like burn)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(frostbite, be like burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(frostbite, is burn)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(frostbite, be like burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(frostbite, burn)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(frostbite, be like burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(frostbite, is burn)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(frostbite, be like burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(frostbite, burn)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(frostbite, be like burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(frostbite, is burn)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(frostbite, be like burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(frostbite, burn)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(frostbite, be like burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(frostbite, is burn)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(frostbite, be like burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(frostbite, burn)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(frostbite, be like burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(frostbite, be like burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(frostbite, be like burn)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(frostbite, be like burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(frostbite, be like burn)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(frostbite, be like burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(sunburn, burn)