frosting: is powdered sugar

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dessert
Weight: 0.54
, stuff
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, sweet
Weight: 0.52
, white chocolate
Weight: 0.50
Siblings icing
Weight: 0.51
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.36
, custard
Weight: 0.36
, tiramisu
Weight: 0.35
, flan
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is powdered sugar 1.00
is sugar 0.87
sugar 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(frosting, is powdered sugar)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(icing, is sugar)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(frosting, is powdered sugar)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(icing, is sugar)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(icing, is sugar)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(frosting, is powdered sugar)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(frosting, is powdered sugar)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(frosting, is powdered sugar)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(frosting, sugar)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(frosting, is powdered sugar)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(frosting, is sugar)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(frosting, is powdered sugar)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(frosting, sugar)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(frosting, is powdered sugar)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(frosting, is sugar)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(frosting, is powdered sugar)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(frosting, sugar)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(frosting, is powdered sugar)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(frosting, is sugar)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(frosting, is powdered sugar)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(frosting, sugar)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(frosting, is powdered sugar)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(frosting, is sugar)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(frosting, is powdered sugar)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(frosting, is powdered sugar)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(frosting, is powdered sugar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(frosting, is powdered sugar)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(frosting, is powdered sugar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(frosting, is powdered sugar)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(icing, is sugar)