frosting: is too runny

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dessert
Weight: 0.54
, stuff
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, sweet
Weight: 0.52
, white chocolate
Weight: 0.50
Siblings icing
Weight: 0.51
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.36
, custard
Weight: 0.36
, tiramisu
Weight: 0.35
, flan
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is too runny 1.00
is runny 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(frosting, is too runny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, is runny)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(frosting, is too runny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(icing, is runny)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(frosting, is too runny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(icing, is runny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(icing, is runny)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(frosting, is too runny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(tiramisu, is runny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, is runny)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(frosting, is too runny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(frosting, is too runny)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(frosting, is too runny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(frosting, is runny)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(frosting, is too runny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(frosting, is runny)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(frosting, is too runny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(frosting, is runny)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(frosting, is too runny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(frosting, is runny)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(frosting, is too runny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(frosting, is too runny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(frosting, is too runny)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(frosting, is too runny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(frosting, is too runny)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(frosting, is too runny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(icing, is runny)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(frosting, is too runny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tiramisu, is runny)