fruit bat: be called fruit bats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bat
Weight: 0.68
, wild animal
Weight: 0.67
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.61
, bird
Weight: 0.60
Siblings baseball bat
Weight: 0.39
, vampire bat
Weight: 0.38
, tree frog
Weight: 0.34
, skunk
Weight: 0.34
, kookaburra
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called fruit bats 1.00
eat fruit 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bat, eat fruit)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(fruit bat, be called fruit bats)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(fruit bat, be called fruit bats)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(bat, eat fruit)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, be called fruit bats)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(bat, eat fruit)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bat, eat fruit)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fruit bat, be called fruit bats)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fruit bat, be called fruit bats)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(fruit bat, be called fruit bats)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(fruit bat, be called fruit bats)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(fruit bat, be called fruit bats)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(fruit bat, eat fruit)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fruit bat, be called fruit bats)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, eat fruit)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(fruit bat, be called fruit bats)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fruit bat, eat fruit)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(fruit bat, be called fruit bats)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(fruit bat, eat fruit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(fruit bat, be called fruit bats)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(fruit bat, be called fruit bats)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, be called fruit bats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(fruit bat, be called fruit bats)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(fruit bat, be called fruit bats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, be called fruit bats)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(bat, eat fruit)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(fruit bat, be called fruit bats)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(bat, eat fruit)