fruit bat: eat fruit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bat
Weight: 0.68
, wild animal
Weight: 0.67
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.61
, bird
Weight: 0.60
Siblings baseball bat
Weight: 0.39
, vampire bat
Weight: 0.38
, tree frog
Weight: 0.34
, skunk
Weight: 0.34
, kookaburra
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
eat fruit 1.00
be called fruit bats 0.81
eat nectar 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bat, eat fruit)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(fruit bat, eat fruit)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fruit bat, eat fruit)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(bat, eat fruit)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, eat fruit)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(bat, eat fruit)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bat, eat fruit)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fruit bat, eat fruit)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fruit bat, eat fruit)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fruit bat, eat fruit)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(fruit bat, eat fruit)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fruit bat, eat fruit)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, be called fruit bats)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(fruit bat, eat fruit)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(fruit bat, be called fruit bats)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fruit bat, eat fruit)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, eat nectar)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(fruit bat, eat fruit)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(fruit bat, eat nectar)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fruit bat, eat fruit)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(fruit bat, eat nectar)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(fruit bat, eat fruit)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(fruit bat, eat nectar)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fruit bat, eat fruit)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fruit bat, be called fruit bats)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(fruit bat, eat fruit)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(fruit bat, be called fruit bats)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(fruit bat, eat fruit)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(fruit bat, eat fruit)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, eat fruit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fruit bat, eat fruit)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(fruit bat, eat fruit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, eat fruit)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(bat, eat fruit)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(fruit bat, eat fruit)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(bat, eat fruit)