fruit bat: has quality questions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bat
Weight: 0.68
, wild animal
Weight: 0.67
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.61
, bird
Weight: 0.60
Siblings baseball bat
Weight: 0.39
, vampire bat
Weight: 0.38
, tree frog
Weight: 0.34
, skunk
Weight: 0.34
, kookaburra
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality questions 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has quality questions)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(vampire bat, has quality questions)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(fruit bat, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(vampire bat, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(vampire bat, has quality questions)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(fruit bat, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(tree frog, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(tree frog, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(fruit bat, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(fruit bat, has quality questions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(fruit bat, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fruit bat, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, has quality questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(fruit bat, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fruit bat, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(vampire bat, has quality questions)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tree frog, has quality questions)