fruit bat: have oral sex

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bat
Weight: 0.68
, wild animal
Weight: 0.67
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.61
, bird
Weight: 0.60
Siblings baseball bat
Weight: 0.39
, vampire bat
Weight: 0.38
, tree frog
Weight: 0.34
, skunk
Weight: 0.34
, kookaburra
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have oral sex 1.00
have sex 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(animal, have sex)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fruit bat, have oral sex)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit bat, have oral sex)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(animal, have sex)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, have oral sex)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(animal, have sex)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(animal, have sex)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fruit bat, have oral sex)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fruit bat, have oral sex)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit bat, have oral sex)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fruit bat, have oral sex)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit bat, have oral sex)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fruit bat, have sex)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fruit bat, have oral sex)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(fruit bat, have sex)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fruit bat, have oral sex)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, have sex)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(fruit bat, have oral sex)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(fruit bat, have sex)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fruit bat, have oral sex)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fruit bat, have oral sex)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, have oral sex)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit bat, have oral sex)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fruit bat, have oral sex)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, have oral sex)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(animal, have sex)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(fruit bat, have oral sex)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(animal, have sex)