fruit bat: look like dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bat
Weight: 0.68
, wild animal
Weight: 0.67
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.61
, bird
Weight: 0.60
Siblings baseball bat
Weight: 0.39
, vampire bat
Weight: 0.38
, tree frog
Weight: 0.34
, skunk
Weight: 0.34
, kookaburra
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
look like dogs 1.00
look like foxes 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bat, look like dogs)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fruit bat, look like dogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit bat, look like dogs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(bat, look like dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, look like dogs)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(bat, look like dogs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bat, look like dogs)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fruit bat, look like dogs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fruit bat, look like dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit bat, look like dogs)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(fruit bat, look like dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit bat, look like dogs)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(fruit bat, look like foxes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(fruit bat, look like dogs)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(fruit bat, look like foxes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fruit bat, look like dogs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, look like foxes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fruit bat, look like dogs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(fruit bat, look like foxes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(fruit bat, look like dogs)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fruit bat, look like dogs)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, look like dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit bat, look like dogs)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fruit bat, look like dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, look like dogs)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(bat, look like dogs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fruit bat, look like dogs)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(bat, look like dogs)