fruit: have water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh food
Weight: 0.66
, material
Weight: 0.62
, snack
Weight: 0.62
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
, crop
Weight: 0.61
Siblings pear
Weight: 0.69
, apple
Weight: 0.67
, watermelon
Weight: 0.67
, peach
Weight: 0.67
, fig
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
have water 1.00
be good in water 0.91
float in water 0.82
contain water 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, have water)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(pear, float in water)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(apple, float in water)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, contain water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(watermelon, have water)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(watermelon, have water)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(pear, float in water)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(pear, float in water)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(watermelon, contain water)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(watermelon, contain water)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(apple, float in water)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(apple, float in water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(fruit, have water)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fruit, be good in water)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fruit, be good in water)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fruit, float in water)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fruit, float in water)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fruit, float in water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fruit, contain water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fruit, contain water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, contain water)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fruit, be good in water)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(fruit, float in water)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(fruit, contain water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fruit, have water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(fruit, have water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(watermelon, have water)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(pear, float in water)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(apple, float in water)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fruit, have water)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(watermelon, contain water)