fry: be high in calories

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, cooking
Weight: 0.48
, place
Weight: 0.48
Siblings fried egg
Weight: 0.35
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.35
, eggs benedict
Weight: 0.34
, stew
Weight: 0.34
, steak
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in calories 1.00
make people fat 0.75
has physical part fat 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(fry, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(steak, be high in calories)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fry, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(steak, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(steak, be high in calories)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fry, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(fry, be high in calories)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fry, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(fry, has physical part fat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(fry, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(fry, has physical part fat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(fry, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fry, has physical part fat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(fry, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(fry, make people fat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(fry, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(fry, make people fat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fry, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(fry, make people fat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(fry, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fry, has physical part fat)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(fry, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(fry, make people fat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(fry, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(fry, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(fry, be high in calories)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fry, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(fry, be high in calories)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(fry, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(steak, be high in calories)