:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, taste bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fry, taste bad)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(fry, taste bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(thing, taste bad)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(thing, taste bad)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(steak, taste good)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(fry, taste bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(fry, taste bad)
Similarity expansion
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(fry, taste bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste bitter)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(fry, taste bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(fry, taste bitter)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(fry, taste bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste cold)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(fry, taste bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(fry, taste cold)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(fry, taste bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(fry, taste bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(fry, taste cold)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(fry, taste bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fry, taste cold)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(fry, taste bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fry, taste good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(fry, taste bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fry, taste good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(fry, taste bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(fry, taste good)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(fry, taste bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fry, taste bad)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste bad)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(steak, taste good)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(fry, taste bad)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)