fry: taste cold

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, cooking
Weight: 0.48
, place
Weight: 0.48
Siblings fried egg
Weight: 0.35
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.35
, eggs benedict
Weight: 0.34
, stew
Weight: 0.34
, steak
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste cold 1.00
taste bad cold 0.97
taste bad 0.90
taste good 0.89
taste bad day 0.88
taste bitter 0.87
taste different 0.87
taste good cooked 0.84
taste cooked 0.83
taste bad next day 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fry, taste cold)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(thing, taste bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(thing, taste bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(steak, taste good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(fry, taste cold)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(steak, taste good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(steak, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(fry, taste cold)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fry, taste bad cold)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste bad cold)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(fry, taste bad cold)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(fry, taste bitter)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste bitter)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(fry, taste bitter)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(fry, taste bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fry, taste bad cold)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(fry, taste bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(fry, taste bitter)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fry, taste bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fry, taste cooked)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fry, taste good cooked)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fry, taste good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(fry, taste cooked)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste good cooked)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(fry, taste good cooked)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fry, taste good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(fry, taste good cooked)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(fry, taste cooked)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste cooked)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(fry, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste cold)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fry, taste cold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(steak, taste good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fry, taste cold)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)