:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, taste bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fry, taste cold)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fry, taste cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(thing, taste bad)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(thing, taste bad)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(steak, taste good)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fry, taste cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(fry, taste cold)
Similarity expansion
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fry, taste cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(fry, taste bitter)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(fry, taste cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste bitter)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fry, taste cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(fry, taste bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(fry, taste cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(fry, taste cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(fry, taste bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fry, taste cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fry, taste bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fry, taste cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fry, taste good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(fry, taste cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fry, taste cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(fry, taste cooked)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fry, taste cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fry, taste good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(fry, taste cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste cooked)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(fry, taste cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(fry, taste good)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fry, taste cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fry, taste cold)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste cold)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(steak, taste good)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fry, taste cold)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)