frying pan: has physical part zones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pan
Weight: 0.80
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.70
, utensil
Weight: 0.64
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.64
, weapon
Weight: 0.63
Siblings microwave oven
Weight: 0.39
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.39
, wok
Weight: 0.38
, skillet
Weight: 0.37
, microwave
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part zones 1.00
has physical part zone 0.93
is free zone 0.82
has physical part radius 0.80
has physical part quick 0.78
has physical part holes 0.78
has physical part plates 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(pan, has physical part zones)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(frying pan, has physical part zones)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(frying pan, has physical part zones)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(pan, has physical part zones)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, has physical part zones)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pan, has physical part zones)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(pan, has physical part zones)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(frying pan, has physical part zones)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(frying pan, has physical part zones)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(frying pan, has physical part zones)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(frying pan, has physical part zones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(frying pan, has physical part zones)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(frying pan, has physical part zones)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, has physical part zones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(frying pan, has physical part zones)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(frying pan, has physical part zones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, has physical part zones)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pan, has physical part zones)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(frying pan, has physical part zones)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pan, has physical part zones)