frying: be became change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.48
, cooking
Weight: 0.44
, process
Weight: 0.43
, way
Weight: 0.38
, preparation
Weight: 0.36
Siblings microwave oven
Weight: 0.32
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.30
, boiling water
Weight: 0.30
, cold turkey
Weight: 0.30
, burning
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be became change 1.00
be became chemical change 0.93
become change 0.89
be become 0.86
be called change 0.80
become chemical change 0.78
be considered change 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(way, be become)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(frying, be became change)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(frying, be became change)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(way, be become)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(frying, be became change)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(way, be become)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(frying, be became change)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(burning, be considered change)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(frying, be became change)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(burning, become chemical change)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(way, be become)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(frying, be became change)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(frying, be became change)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(frying, be became change)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(burning, become chemical change)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(burning, become chemical change)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(frying, be became change)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(burning, be considered change)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(burning, be considered change)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(frying, be became change)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(frying, be became change)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(frying, be became change)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(frying, be became change)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(frying, be became chemical change)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(frying, be became change)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(frying, be became chemical change)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(frying, be became change)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(frying, be became chemical change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(frying, be became change)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(frying, be became change)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(frying, be became change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(frying, be became change)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(frying, be became change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(frying, be became change)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(way, be become)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(frying, be became change)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(burning, become chemical change)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(frying, be became change)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(burning, be considered change)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(frying, be became change)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(way, be become)