frying: be became chemical change

Related concepts

Parents	method Weight: 0.48 , cooking Weight: 0.44 , process Weight: 0.43 , way Weight: 0.38 , preparation Weight: 0.36
Siblings	microwave oven Weight: 0.32 , kitchen utensil Weight: 0.30 , boiling water Weight: 0.30 , cold turkey Weight: 0.30 , burning Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be became chemical change	1.00
be became change	0.93
become chemical change	0.92
be called chemical change	0.87
be considered chemical change	0.86
is chemical change	0.86
be chemical change	0.85
become change	0.85
be classified as chemical change	0.82
be example of chemical change	0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(cooking, is chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(frying, be became chemical change)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(cooking, be chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(frying, be became chemical change)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(cooking, be considered chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(frying, be became chemical change)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(cooking, be called chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(frying, be became chemical change)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(cooking, be called chemical change)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(cooking, be considered chemical change)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(cooking, is chemical change)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(cooking, be chemical change)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(cooking, be called chemical change)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(cooking, be considered chemical change)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(cooking, is chemical change)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(cooking, be chemical change)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(burning, become chemical change)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(burning, be considered chemical change)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(burning, is chemical change)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(burning, be classified as chemical change)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(burning, be example of chemical change)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(cooking, be called chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(frying, be became chemical change)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(cooking, be considered chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(frying, be became chemical change)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(cooking, is chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(frying, be became chemical change)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(cooking, be chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(frying, be became chemical change)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(burning, is chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(burning, is chemical change)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(burning, become chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(burning, become chemical change)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(burning, be considered chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(burning, be considered chemical change)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(burning, be example of chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(burning, be example of chemical change)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(burning, be classified as chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(burning, be classified as chemical change)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(frying, be became chemical change)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(frying, be became change)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.08

Salient(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Salient(frying, be became change)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(frying, be became change)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(frying, be example of chemical change)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.08

Salient(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Salient(frying, be example of chemical change)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(frying, is chemical change)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.08

Salient(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Salient(frying, is chemical change)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(frying, is chemical change)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(frying, be became change)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(frying, be example of chemical change)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(frying, is chemical change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.08

Salient(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(frying, be became chemical change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(cooking, be called chemical change)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(cooking, be considered chemical change)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(cooking, is chemical change)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(cooking, be chemical change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(burning, become chemical change)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(burning, is chemical change)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(burning, be considered chemical change)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(burning, be classified as chemical change)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(burning, be example of chemical change)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(cooking, be considered chemical change)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(cooking, be called chemical change)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(cooking, be chemical change)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(frying, be became chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(cooking, is chemical change)