frying: be example of chemical change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.48
, cooking
Weight: 0.44
, process
Weight: 0.43
, way
Weight: 0.38
, preparation
Weight: 0.36
Siblings microwave oven
Weight: 0.32
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.30
, boiling water
Weight: 0.30
, cold turkey
Weight: 0.30
, burning
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be example of chemical change 1.00
be chemical change 0.93
is chemical change 0.93
be called chemical change 0.92
be considered chemical change 0.91
become chemical change 0.90
be example of change 0.89
be classified as chemical change 0.87
is chemical 0.86
be chemical 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cooking, be chemical change)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(frying, be example of chemical change)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cooking, is chemical change)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(frying, be example of chemical change)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(cooking, be called chemical change)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(frying, be example of chemical change)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cooking, be considered chemical change)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(frying, be example of chemical change)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(cooking, be called chemical change)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(cooking, be considered chemical change)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(cooking, is chemical change)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(cooking, be chemical change)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be called chemical change)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cooking, is chemical change)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be chemical change)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be considered chemical change)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(burning, be example of chemical change)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(burning, be considered chemical change)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(burning, is chemical change)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(burning, become chemical change)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(burning, be example of change)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(burning, be classified as chemical change)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(burning, be chemical)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cooking, be chemical change)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(frying, be example of chemical change)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cooking, is chemical change)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(frying, be example of chemical change)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(cooking, be called chemical change)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(frying, be example of chemical change)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cooking, be considered chemical change)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(frying, be example of chemical change)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(burning, is chemical change)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(burning, is chemical change)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(burning, be chemical)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(burning, be chemical)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(burning, become chemical change)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(burning, become chemical change)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(burning, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(burning, be example of chemical change)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(burning, be considered chemical change)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(burning, be considered chemical change)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(burning, be classified as chemical change)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(burning, be classified as chemical change)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(burning, be example of change)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(burning, be example of change)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(frying, be example of chemical change)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(frying, be example of change)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(frying, be example of change)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(frying, be example of change)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(frying, is chemical change)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(frying, is chemical change)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(frying, is chemical change)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(frying, is chemical change)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(frying, be example of change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(frying, be example of chemical change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(cooking, be chemical change)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(cooking, is chemical change)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(cooking, be called chemical change)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(cooking, be considered chemical change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(burning, be example of chemical change)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(burning, is chemical change)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(burning, be considered chemical change)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(burning, become chemical change)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(burning, be chemical)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(burning, be example of change)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(burning, be classified as chemical change)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(cooking, be chemical change)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(cooking, be called chemical change)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(cooking, be considered chemical change)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(frying, be example of chemical change)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(cooking, is chemical change)