frying: is baking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.48
, cooking
Weight: 0.44
, process
Weight: 0.43
, way
Weight: 0.38
, preparation
Weight: 0.36
Siblings microwave oven
Weight: 0.32
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.30
, boiling water
Weight: 0.30
, cold turkey
Weight: 0.30
, burning
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is baking 1.00
be much faster baking 0.87
be considered cooking 0.82
cook food 0.78
be considered healthy cooking 0.78
be compared to cooking at work 0.78
be compared to cooking 0.78
be in microwave oven 0.77
is cooking method 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cooking, be considered healthy cooking)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(frying, is baking)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(frying, is baking)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cooking, be in microwave oven)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(frying, is baking)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cooking, be in microwave oven)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cooking, be considered healthy cooking)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be in microwave oven)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be considered healthy cooking)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, cook food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cooking, be considered healthy cooking)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(frying, is baking)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(frying, is baking)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cooking, be in microwave oven)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(frying, is baking)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(microwave oven, cook food)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(microwave oven, cook food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(frying, is baking)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(frying, be much faster baking)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(frying, be much faster baking)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(frying, be much faster baking)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(frying, be much faster baking)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(frying, is cooking method)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(frying, is cooking method)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(frying, is cooking method)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(frying, is cooking method)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(frying, is baking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(frying, is baking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(cooking, be in microwave oven)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cooking, be considered healthy cooking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(microwave oven, cook food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(cooking, be in microwave oven)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(frying, is baking)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cooking, be considered healthy cooking)