frying: is cooking method

Related concepts

Parents	method Weight: 0.48 , cooking Weight: 0.44 , process Weight: 0.43 , way Weight: 0.38 , preparation Weight: 0.36
Siblings	microwave oven Weight: 0.32 , kitchen utensil Weight: 0.30 , boiling water Weight: 0.30 , cold turkey Weight: 0.30 , burning Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is cooking method	1.00
be considered cooking	0.87
be considered healthy cooking	0.82
be compared to cooking	0.82
be compared to cooking at work	0.81
differ from method	0.80
differ from cooking	0.79
cook food	0.78
is baking	0.77
differ from chinese cooking	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(cooking, differ from chinese cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(frying, is cooking method)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(cooking, be considered healthy cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(frying, is cooking method)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(cooking, be compared to cooking at work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(frying, is cooking method)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(method, differ from method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(frying, is cooking method)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(method, differ from method)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(cooking, be considered healthy cooking)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(cooking, differ from chinese cooking)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(cooking, differ from chinese cooking)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(cooking, be considered healthy cooking)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(method, differ from method)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, cook food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(cooking, be considered healthy cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(frying, is cooking method)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(cooking, be compared to cooking at work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(frying, is cooking method)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(cooking, differ from chinese cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(frying, is cooking method)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(method, differ from method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(frying, is cooking method)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(microwave oven, cook food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(microwave oven, cook food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(frying, is cooking method)

Similarity expansion

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(frying, is baking)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(frying, is baking)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(frying, is baking)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(frying, is baking)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(frying, is cooking method)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(frying, is cooking method)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(method, differ from method)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(cooking, be considered healthy cooking)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(cooking, differ from chinese cooking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(microwave oven, cook food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(method, differ from method)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(cooking, be compared to cooking at work)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(cooking, be considered healthy cooking)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(frying, is cooking method) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(cooking, differ from chinese cooking)