frying: is reaction

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.48
, cooking
Weight: 0.44
, process
Weight: 0.43
, way
Weight: 0.38
, preparation
Weight: 0.36
Siblings microwave oven
Weight: 0.32
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.30
, boiling water
Weight: 0.30
, cold turkey
Weight: 0.30
, burning
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is reaction 1.00
be reaction 1.00
is reactions 0.90
is chemical reaction 0.89
be chemical reaction 0.88
be considered chemical reaction 0.87
is chemical reactions 0.83
be referred as dehydration reaction 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(preparation, be referred as dehydration reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(frying, is reaction)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(cooking, is chemical reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(frying, is reaction)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cooking, be considered chemical reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(frying, is reaction)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(cooking, is chemical reactions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(frying, is reaction)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cooking, is chemical reaction)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cooking, is chemical reactions)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(preparation, be referred as dehydration reaction)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(preparation, be referred as dehydration reaction)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(cooking, is chemical reaction)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(cooking, is chemical reactions)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(burning, be reaction)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(burning, is reaction)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(burning, be chemical reaction)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(burning, is chemical reaction)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(preparation, be referred as dehydration reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(frying, is reaction)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(cooking, is chemical reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(frying, is reaction)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cooking, be considered chemical reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(frying, is reaction)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(cooking, is chemical reactions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(frying, is reaction)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(burning, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(burning, is reaction)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(burning, be reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(burning, be reaction)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(burning, is chemical reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(burning, is chemical reaction)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(burning, be chemical reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(burning, be chemical reaction)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(frying, is reaction)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(frying, is chemical reaction)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(frying, is chemical reaction)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(frying, is chemical reaction)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(frying, is chemical reaction)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(frying, is reaction)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(frying, is reaction)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(cooking, is chemical reaction)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(cooking, is chemical reactions)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(preparation, be referred as dehydration reaction)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(burning, is reaction)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(burning, is chemical reaction)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(burning, be reaction)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(burning, be chemical reaction)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(cooking, is chemical reaction)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cooking, be considered chemical reaction)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(cooking, is chemical reactions)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(frying, is reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(preparation, be referred as dehydration reaction)