fuel: be cheaper than renewable energy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.66
, petroleum
Weight: 0.66
, operating expense
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.61
, ingredient
Weight: 0.60
Siblings fuel oil
Weight: 0.80
, petrol
Weight: 0.75
, propane
Weight: 0.72
, gasoline
Weight: 0.70
, motor oil
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than renewable energy 1.00
be used instead of renewable energy 0.94
is renewable 0.92
be called renewable 0.91
is renewable energy sources 0.90
be considered renewable energy sources 0.90
is non renewable energy sources 0.90
is non renewable 0.89
be called renewable fuels 0.89
be considered non renewable energy sources 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be cheaper than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, is non renewable)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be cheaper than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(petrol, is renewable)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be cheaper than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, is renewable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fuel, be cheaper than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(gasoline, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(gasoline, is renewable)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fuel, be cheaper than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(gasoline, is non renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(gasoline, is non renewable)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fuel, be cheaper than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(petrol, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(petrol, is renewable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fuel, be cheaper than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(fuel, be cheaper than renewable energy)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(fuel, be cheaper than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(fuel, is non renewable energy sources)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(fuel, be cheaper than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(fuel, is non renewable energy sources)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fuel, be cheaper than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fuel, is non renewable energy sources)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(fuel, be cheaper than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fuel, is renewable)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(fuel, be cheaper than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fuel, is non renewable energy sources)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(fuel, be cheaper than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(fuel, is renewable)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fuel, be cheaper than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fuel, is renewable)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(fuel, be cheaper than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fuel, is renewable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(fuel, be cheaper than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(fuel, be cheaper than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be cheaper than renewable energy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fuel, be cheaper than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(fuel, be cheaper than renewable energy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be cheaper than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(gasoline, is non renewable)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be cheaper than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(petrol, is renewable)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be cheaper than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(gasoline, is renewable)