fuel: be considered resources

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.66
, petroleum
Weight: 0.66
, operating expense
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.61
, ingredient
Weight: 0.60
Siblings fuel oil
Weight: 0.80
, petrol
Weight: 0.75
, propane
Weight: 0.72
, gasoline
Weight: 0.70
, motor oil
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered resources 1.00
be called resources 0.94
be known as resources 0.92
be considered resource 0.90
be classified resources 0.90
is natural resources 0.89
has quality resources 0.89
be known as natural resources 0.89
be considered nonrenewable resources 0.87
is exhaustible resources 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(petroleum, has quality resources)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(fuel, be considered resources)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(fuel, be considered resources)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(petroleum, has quality resources)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be considered resources)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(petroleum, has quality resources)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(petroleum, has quality resources)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(fuel, be considered resources)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(fuel, be considered resources)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(fuel, be considered resources)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(fuel, be considered resources)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(fuel, be considered resources)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(fuel, is natural resources)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(fuel, be considered resources)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(fuel, be considered resources)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(fuel, be considered resources)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(fuel, be considered resources)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(fuel, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(fuel, be considered resources)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(fuel, is natural resources)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(fuel, be considered resources)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fuel, is natural resources)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(fuel, be considered resources)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(fuel, is natural resources)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(fuel, be considered resources)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(fuel, be considered resources)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be considered resources)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(fuel, be considered resources)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(fuel, be considered resources)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be considered resources)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(petroleum, has quality resources)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(fuel, be considered resources)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(petroleum, has quality resources)