function: be differentiable at cusps

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, process
Weight: 0.60
, message
Weight: 0.59
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.79
, cell division
Weight: 0.67
, wedding reception
Weight: 0.67
, birthday party
Weight: 0.67
, operating system
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be differentiable at cusps 1.00
is differentiable 0.82
be differentiable at corners 0.80
stratified epithelial differ of simple epithelial 0.77
stratified epithelial differ of epithelial 0.76
be in eukaryotic cells more complex than in prokaryotic cells 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(function, be differentiable at cusps)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be in eukaryotic cells more complex than in prokaryotic cells)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(function, be differentiable at cusps)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cell division, be in eukaryotic cells more complex than in prokaryotic cells)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(cell division, be in eukaryotic cells more complex than in prokaryotic cells)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(function, be differentiable at cusps)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(function, be differentiable at cusps)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(function, be differentiable at cusps)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(function, stratified epithelial differ of simple epithelial)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(function, be differentiable at cusps)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(function, be differentiable at corners)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(function, be differentiable at cusps)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(function, is differentiable)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(function, be differentiable at cusps)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(function, stratified epithelial differ of simple epithelial)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(function, be differentiable at cusps)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(function, be differentiable at corners)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(function, be differentiable at cusps)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(function, is differentiable)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(function, be differentiable at cusps)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(function, stratified epithelial differ of simple epithelial)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(function, be differentiable at cusps)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(function, stratified epithelial differ of simple epithelial)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(function, be differentiable at cusps)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(function, be differentiable at corners)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(function, be differentiable at cusps)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(function, is differentiable)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(function, be differentiable at cusps)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(function, is differentiable)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(function, be differentiable at cusps)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(function, be differentiable at corners)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(function, be differentiable at cusps)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(function, be differentiable at cusps)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(function, be differentiable at cusps)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(function, be differentiable at cusps)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(function, be differentiable at cusps)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(function, be differentiable at cusps)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cell division, be in eukaryotic cells more complex than in prokaryotic cells)