function: be formed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, process
Weight: 0.60
, message
Weight: 0.59
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.79
, cell division
Weight: 0.67
, wedding reception
Weight: 0.67
, birthday party
Weight: 0.67
, operating system
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be formed 1.00
be established 0.80
be created 0.79
get created 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(characteristic, be established)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(function, be formed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(function, be formed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(characteristic, be established)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(function, be formed)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, be established)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(function, be formed)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(operating system, be created)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(function, be formed)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(operating system, get created)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(characteristic, be established)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(function, be formed)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(function, be formed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(function, be formed)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(operating system, be created)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(operating system, be created)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(function, be formed)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(operating system, get created)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(operating system, get created)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(function, be formed)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(function, be formed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(function, be formed)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(function, be formed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(function, be formed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(function, be formed)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(function, be formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(function, be formed)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(characteristic, be established)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(function, be formed)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(operating system, be created)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(function, be formed)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(operating system, get created)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(function, be formed)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(characteristic, be established)