function: be important in architecture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, process
Weight: 0.60
, message
Weight: 0.59
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.79
, cell division
Weight: 0.67
, wedding reception
Weight: 0.67
, birthday party
Weight: 0.67
, operating system
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in architecture 1.00
be important in design 0.85
is design 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(process, is design)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(function, be important in architecture)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(function, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(process, is design)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(process, is design)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(process, is design)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(function, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(function, be important in architecture)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(function, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(function, be important in architecture)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(function, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(function, be important in design)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(function, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(function, be important in design)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(function, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(function, be important in design)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(function, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in design)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(function, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(function, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in architecture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(function, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(function, be important in architecture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(process, is design)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(function, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(process, is design)