function: be related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, process
Weight: 0.60
, message
Weight: 0.59
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.79
, cell division
Weight: 0.67
, wedding reception
Weight: 0.67
, birthday party
Weight: 0.67
, operating system
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related 1.00
is related 0.99
be important as related 0.91
be related to number 0.86
be related to area 0.85
be related to spread 0.82
be important as related to size 0.82
be related to numbers 0.81
be related use examples 0.78
be related to prime number 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(process, be related)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(function, be related)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(characteristic, be related)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(function, be related)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(function, be related)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(factor, be related to prime number)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(function, be related)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(message, is related)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(function, be related)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, be related to area)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(function, be related)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(factor, be related to number)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(function, be related)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(factor, be related use examples)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(function, be related)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(factor, be related to numbers)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(function, be related)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(message, is related)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(factor, be related)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(characteristic, be related)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(process, be related)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(factor, be related to number)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(factor, be related to area)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(factor, be related to numbers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(factor, be related use examples)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(factor, be related to prime number)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, be related)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(process, be related)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to prime number)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to numbers)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to number)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(message, is related)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to area)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related use examples)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(process, be related)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(function, be related)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(characteristic, be related)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(function, be related)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(function, be related)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(message, is related)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(function, be related)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(factor, be related to prime number)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(function, be related)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, be related to area)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(function, be related)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(factor, be related to number)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(function, be related)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(factor, be related to numbers)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(function, be related)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(factor, be related use examples)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(function, be related)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(cell division, be related)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cell division, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(function, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(function, be related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(function, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(message, is related)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(factor, be related to number)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(factor, be related use examples)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(factor, be related to numbers)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(factor, be related to area)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(characteristic, be related)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(process, be related)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(factor, be related to prime number)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cell division, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(message, is related)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(characteristic, be related)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(process, be related)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(factor, be related to number)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(factor, be related to area)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(factor, be related to numbers)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(factor, be related use examples)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(function, be related)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(factor, be related to prime number)