function: has quality difference

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, process
Weight: 0.60
, message
Weight: 0.59
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.79
, cell division
Weight: 0.67
, wedding reception
Weight: 0.67
, birthday party
Weight: 0.67
, operating system
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality difference 1.00
has quality good 0.80
is quality 0.79
has quality bad 0.77
has quality question 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(process, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(process, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality question)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(function, has quality difference)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(operating system, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality question)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(function, has quality difference)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(operating system, has quality question)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(operating system, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)