functional group: be called functional groups

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents group
Weight: 0.77
, structure
Weight: 0.63
, phosphoric acid
Weight: 0.58
, polymer
Weight: 0.57
Siblings amide
Weight: 0.66
, amine
Weight: 0.63
, carbohydrate
Weight: 0.61
, operation
Weight: 0.61
, derivative
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called functional groups 1.00
be called groups 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(group, be called functional groups)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(functional group, be called functional groups)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(functional group, be called functional groups)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(group, be called functional groups)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(functional group, be called functional groups)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(group, be called functional groups)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(group, be called functional groups)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(functional group, be called functional groups)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(functional group, be called functional groups)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(functional group, be called functional groups)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(functional group, be called functional groups)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(functional group, be called functional groups)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(functional group, be called groups)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(functional group, be called functional groups)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(functional group, be called groups)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(functional group, be called functional groups)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(functional group, be called groups)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(functional group, be called functional groups)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(functional group, be called groups)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(functional group, be called functional groups)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(functional group, be called functional groups)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(functional group, be called functional groups)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(functional group, be called functional groups)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(functional group, be called functional groups)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(functional group, be called functional groups)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(group, be called functional groups)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(functional group, be called functional groups)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(group, be called functional groups)