functionalism: be better than behaviourism

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents term
Weight: 0.50
, topic
Weight: 0.50
, view
Weight: 0.49
, theory
Weight: 0.46
, approach
Weight: 0.44
Siblings constructivism
Weight: 0.33
, theology
Weight: 0.31
, formalism
Weight: 0.31
, naturalism
Weight: 0.31
, political ideology
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than behaviourism 1.00
be better than life 0.93
be better than whole life 0.87
has quality better 0.86
be faster than tables 0.81
be more useful than laws 0.78
be better than identity theory 0.77
be more important than facts 0.76
be stronger than hypothesis 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(term, be better than life)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(term, be better than whole life)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(approach, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(view, be faster than tables)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(theory, be more important than facts)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(view, be faster than tables)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(term, be better than life)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(theory, be more useful than laws)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(theory, be more important than facts)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(term, be better than whole life)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(approach, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(view, be faster than tables)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(term, be better than whole life)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(approach, has quality better)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(term, be better than life)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more useful than laws)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more important than facts)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(term, be better than life)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(term, be better than whole life)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(approach, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(view, be faster than tables)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(theory, be more important than facts)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be better than identity theory)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(functionalism, be better than identity theory)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be better than identity theory)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(functionalism, be better than identity theory)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(theory, be more useful than laws)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(theory, be more important than facts)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(term, be better than life)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(view, be faster than tables)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(term, be better than whole life)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(approach, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(theory, be more useful than laws)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(theory, be more important than facts)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(term, be better than life)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(view, be faster than tables)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(term, be better than whole life)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(functionalism, be better than behaviourism)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(approach, has quality better)