functionalism: be considered micro sociological theory

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents term
Weight: 0.50
, topic
Weight: 0.50
, view
Weight: 0.49
, theory
Weight: 0.46
, approach
Weight: 0.44
Siblings constructivism
Weight: 0.33
, theology
Weight: 0.31
, formalism
Weight: 0.31
, naturalism
Weight: 0.31
, political ideology
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered micro sociological theory 1.00
be considered sociological theory 0.95
be considered micro theory 0.92
be important to sociological project 0.87
be considered theory 0.82
is theory 0.81
be more important than modern theories 0.80
is structural theory 0.78
be relevant in social science 0.77
is best theory 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(theory, be important to sociological project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(theory, be more important than modern theories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(theory, be relevant in social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(theory, be more important than modern theories)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(theory, be relevant in social science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(theory, be important to sociological project)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important to sociological project)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(theory, be relevant in social science)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more important than modern theories)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(theory, be important to sociological project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(theory, be more important than modern theories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(theory, be relevant in social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(functionalism, is theory)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(functionalism, is structural theory)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered theory)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered theory)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(functionalism, is theory)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(functionalism, be considered theory)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(functionalism, is structural theory)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(functionalism, is theory)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is best theory)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(functionalism, is structural theory)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered theory)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is theory)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is structural theory)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(functionalism, is best theory)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(functionalism, is best theory)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(functionalism, is best theory)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(theory, be more important than modern theories)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(theory, be important to sociological project)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(theory, be relevant in social science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(theory, be more important than modern theories)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(theory, be relevant in social science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(theory, be important to sociological project)