functionalism: be considered micro theory

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents term
Weight: 0.50
, topic
Weight: 0.50
, view
Weight: 0.49
, theory
Weight: 0.46
, approach
Weight: 0.44
Siblings constructivism
Weight: 0.33
, theology
Weight: 0.31
, formalism
Weight: 0.31
, naturalism
Weight: 0.31
, political ideology
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered micro theory 1.00
be considered micro sociological theory 0.92
be considered theory 0.86
is theory 0.83
be considered sociological theory 0.81
is best theory 0.81
be more important than modern theories 0.77
be different from hypothesis 0.77
is structural theory 0.77
be more important than theories 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(theory, be more important than modern theories)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(theory, be more important than theories)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(theory, be different from hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered micro theory)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(theory, be different from hypothesis)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(theory, be more important than theories)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(theory, be more important than modern theories)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more important than modern theories)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more important than theories)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(theory, be different from hypothesis)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(theory, be more important than modern theories)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(theory, be more important than theories)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(theory, be different from hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro theory)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(functionalism, be considered micro theory)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered theory)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(functionalism, is theory)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered theory)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(functionalism, is structural theory)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(functionalism, is theory)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(functionalism, is structural theory)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(functionalism, be considered theory)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is best theory)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(functionalism, is theory)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered theory)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(functionalism, is best theory)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(functionalism, is structural theory)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is theory)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is structural theory)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(functionalism, is best theory)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(functionalism, is best theory)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro theory)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered micro theory)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(theory, be different from hypothesis)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(theory, be more important than theories)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(theory, be more important than modern theories)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(theory, be different from hypothesis)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(theory, be more important than theories)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(theory, be more important than modern theories)