functionalism: be considered sociological theory

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents term
Weight: 0.50
, topic
Weight: 0.50
, view
Weight: 0.49
, theory
Weight: 0.46
, approach
Weight: 0.44
Siblings constructivism
Weight: 0.33
, theology
Weight: 0.31
, formalism
Weight: 0.31
, naturalism
Weight: 0.31
, political ideology
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered sociological theory 1.00
be considered micro sociological theory 0.95
be important to sociological project 0.89
be considered theory 0.86
is theory 0.85
be more important than modern theories 0.82
be considered micro theory 0.81
be more important than theories 0.80
is best theory 0.80
be different from hypothesis 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(theory, be important to sociological project)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(theory, be more important than modern theories)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(theory, be more important than theories)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(theory, be different from hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(theory, be different from hypothesis)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(theory, be more important than theories)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(theory, be more important than modern theories)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(theory, be important to sociological project)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important to sociological project)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more important than modern theories)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more important than theories)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(theory, be different from hypothesis)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(theory, be important to sociological project)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(theory, be more important than modern theories)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(theory, be more important than theories)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(theory, be different from hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered micro sociological theory)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(functionalism, is theory)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered theory)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered theory)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(functionalism, is theory)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(functionalism, be considered theory)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is best theory)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered theory)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(functionalism, is theory)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is theory)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be considered micro theory)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(functionalism, is best theory)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(functionalism, is best theory)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(functionalism, is best theory)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(theory, be different from hypothesis)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(theory, be more important than theories)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(theory, be more important than modern theories)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(theory, be important to sociological project)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(theory, be different from hypothesis)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(theory, be more important than theories)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(theory, be more important than modern theories)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(functionalism, be considered sociological theory)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(theory, be important to sociological project)