functionalism: be important in history

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents term
Weight: 0.50
, topic
Weight: 0.50
, view
Weight: 0.49
, theory
Weight: 0.46
, approach
Weight: 0.44
Siblings constructivism
Weight: 0.33
, theology
Weight: 0.31
, formalism
Weight: 0.31
, naturalism
Weight: 0.31
, political ideology
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in history 1.00
has time history 0.91
be important in history of psychology 0.87
be important counselling 0.83
be important to geoligists 0.83
be most important thing in science 0.80
is history definition 0.79
point of is literature important 0.78
be important in literature 0.78
be important today 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(theory, be important counselling)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in history)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in history)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(theory, be most important thing in science)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in history)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(view, point of is literature important)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in history)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(theory, be important counselling)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(theory, be most important thing in science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(view, point of is literature important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important counselling)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(view, point of is literature important)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(theory, be most important thing in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, is history definition)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(naturalism, be important in literature)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, has time history)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(theory, be important counselling)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in history)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in history)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(theory, be most important thing in science)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in history)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(view, point of is literature important)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in history)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(constructivism, has time history)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(constructivism, has time history)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(constructivism, is history definition)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(constructivism, is history definition)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(naturalism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(naturalism, be important in literature)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(functionalism, be important in history)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(functionalism, be important today)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important today)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important today)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important today)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in history)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(theory, be important counselling)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be most important thing in science)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(view, point of is literature important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(constructivism, has time history)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(constructivism, is history definition)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(naturalism, be important in literature)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(theory, be important counselling)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be most important thing in science)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(functionalism, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(view, point of is literature important)