functionalism: be important in history of psychology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents term
Weight: 0.50
, topic
Weight: 0.50
, view
Weight: 0.49
, theory
Weight: 0.46
, approach
Weight: 0.44
Siblings constructivism
Weight: 0.33
, theology
Weight: 0.31
, formalism
Weight: 0.31
, naturalism
Weight: 0.31
, political ideology
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in history of psychology 1.00
be important in psychology 0.96
be important to psychology 0.95
is psychology 0.92
be to psychology 0.92
be used in psychology 0.92
be important in history 0.87
be important in sociology 0.86
be important part of sociology 0.86
be used in developmental psychology 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be important in psychology)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(theory, be important part of sociology)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(approach, be to psychology)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(theory, be important in sociology)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be used in developmental psychology)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in psychology)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(approach, be to psychology)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in sociology)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(theory, be important part of sociology)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(theory, be used in developmental psychology)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(approach, be to psychology)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in psychology)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in sociology)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(theory, be used in developmental psychology)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important part of sociology)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, is psychology)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be important in psychology)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(approach, be to psychology)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(theory, be important part of sociology)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(theory, be important in sociology)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be used in developmental psychology)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(constructivism, is psychology)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(constructivism, is psychology)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(functionalism, be important in psychology)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in psychology)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(functionalism, be important to psychology)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important to psychology)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in psychology)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important to psychology)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(functionalism, be important in sociology)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in sociology)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(functionalism, be important in history)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in history)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in sociology)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in history)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(theory, be important in psychology)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(approach, be to psychology)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important in sociology)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(theory, be important part of sociology)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be used in developmental psychology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(constructivism, is psychology)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(theory, be important in psychology)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(approach, be to psychology)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important in sociology)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(theory, be important part of sociology)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be used in developmental psychology)