functionalism: be useful understanding

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents term
Weight: 0.50
, topic
Weight: 0.50
, view
Weight: 0.49
, theory
Weight: 0.46
, approach
Weight: 0.44
Siblings constructivism
Weight: 0.33
, theology
Weight: 0.31
, formalism
Weight: 0.31
, naturalism
Weight: 0.31
, political ideology
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful understanding 1.00
is useful 0.84
be useful as framework 0.80
is helpful 0.79
be practical ways determine 0.78
be useful as organizing framework 0.78
be important to experience 0.78
be useful in field 0.78
be important counselling 0.76
be important to geoligists 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(approach, is useful)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(functionalism, be useful understanding)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(theory, be important counselling)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(functionalism, be useful understanding)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(functionalism, be useful understanding)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(theory, is useful)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(functionalism, be useful understanding)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(theory, be useful as organizing framework)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(functionalism, be useful understanding)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(theory, be practical ways determine)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(functionalism, be useful understanding)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(theory, is useful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(theory, be practical ways determine)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(theory, be useful as organizing framework)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(approach, is useful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(theory, be important counselling)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important counselling)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(approach, is useful)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(theory, be useful as organizing framework)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(theory, is useful)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(theory, be practical ways determine)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(theology, be important to experience)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(approach, is useful)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be useful understanding)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(theory, is useful)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be useful understanding)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(theory, be useful as organizing framework)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be useful understanding)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(theory, be important counselling)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be useful understanding)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be useful understanding)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(theory, be practical ways determine)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be useful understanding)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(theology, be important to experience)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(theology, be important to experience)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(functionalism, be useful understanding)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(functionalism, is useful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is useful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(functionalism, is useful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(functionalism, is useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be useful understanding)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(functionalism, be useful understanding)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(theory, be practical ways determine)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(theory, is useful)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(theory, be useful as organizing framework)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(approach, is useful)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(theory, be important counselling)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(theology, be important to experience)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(theory, is useful)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(theory, be practical ways determine)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(theory, be useful as organizing framework)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(approach, is useful)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(functionalism, be useful understanding)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(theory, be important counselling)