functionalism: defining social role

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents term
Weight: 0.50
, topic
Weight: 0.50
, view
Weight: 0.49
, theory
Weight: 0.46
, approach
Weight: 0.44
Siblings constructivism
Weight: 0.33
, theology
Weight: 0.31
, formalism
Weight: 0.31
, naturalism
Weight: 0.31
, political ideology
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
defining social role 1.00
defining role 0.96
defining social role of scientist 0.91
defining role of scientist 0.87
differ defining 0.83
be important in social work 0.82
be used in social work 0.76
be important in social work practice 0.76
be useful as organizing framework 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(theory, be important in social work)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(functionalism, defining social role)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(theory, be important in social work practice)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(functionalism, defining social role)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(theory, be used in social work)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(functionalism, defining social role)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(theory, be useful as organizing framework)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(functionalism, defining social role)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(theory, be useful as organizing framework)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(theory, be used in social work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in social work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in social work practice)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in social work practice)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in social work)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be used in social work)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(theory, be useful as organizing framework)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(theory, be important in social work)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(functionalism, defining social role)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(theory, be important in social work practice)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(functionalism, defining social role)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(theory, be used in social work)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(functionalism, defining social role)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(theory, be useful as organizing framework)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(functionalism, defining social role)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(functionalism, defining social role)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining role)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(functionalism, defining role)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining role of scientist)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(functionalism, differ defining)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(functionalism, differ defining)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(functionalism, defining role)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(functionalism, differ defining)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(functionalism, defining role of scientist)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(functionalism, defining role)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, differ defining)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(functionalism, defining role of scientist)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(functionalism, defining role of scientist)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(functionalism, defining social role)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(theory, be useful as organizing framework)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(theory, be used in social work)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(theory, be important in social work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(theory, be important in social work practice)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(theory, be useful as organizing framework)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(theory, be used in social work)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(theory, be important in social work)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(functionalism, defining social role)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(theory, be important in social work practice)