functionalism: defining social role of scientist

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents term
Weight: 0.50
, topic
Weight: 0.50
, view
Weight: 0.49
, theory
Weight: 0.46
, approach
Weight: 0.44
Siblings constructivism
Weight: 0.33
, theology
Weight: 0.31
, formalism
Weight: 0.31
, naturalism
Weight: 0.31
, political ideology
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
defining social role of scientist 1.00
defining role of scientist 0.98
defining social role 0.91
defining role 0.88
be relevant in social science 0.78
be important in social work 0.78
be important in social sciences 0.77
be important to science 0.76
differ defining 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(theory, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(theory, be important in social work)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(theory, be relevant in social science)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(theory, be important in social sciences)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(theory, be relevant in social science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in social work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in social sciences)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(theory, be important to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in social sciences)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in social work)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important to science)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(theory, be relevant in social science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(theory, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(theory, be important in social work)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(theory, be relevant in social science)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(theory, be important in social sciences)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(functionalism, defining role of scientist)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(functionalism, defining role of scientist)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(functionalism, defining role of scientist)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(functionalism, defining social role)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(functionalism, defining social role)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(functionalism, defining social role)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(functionalism, defining role)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(functionalism, defining role)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(functionalism, defining role)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(functionalism, differ defining)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining role of scientist)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(functionalism, differ defining)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(functionalism, differ defining)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining role)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, differ defining)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(theory, be relevant in social science)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(theory, be important in social sciences)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(theory, be important in social work)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(theory, be relevant in social science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(theory, be important in social work)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(theory, be important in social sciences)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(functionalism, defining social role of scientist)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important to science)