functionalism: differ defining

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents term
Weight: 0.50
, topic
Weight: 0.50
, view
Weight: 0.49
, theory
Weight: 0.46
, approach
Weight: 0.44
Siblings constructivism
Weight: 0.33
, theology
Weight: 0.31
, formalism
Weight: 0.31
, naturalism
Weight: 0.31
, political ideology
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
differ defining 1.00
defining role 0.86
defining social role 0.83
differ among people 0.80
differ from guess 0.79
differ from behaviorism 0.79
differ from law 0.79
defining role of scientist 0.77
be defined 0.77
is defined as 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(view, differ among people)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(functionalism, differ defining)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(theory, differ from law)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(functionalism, differ defining)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(theory, differ from behaviorism)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(functionalism, differ defining)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(theory, differ from guess)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(functionalism, differ defining)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(theory, differ from guess)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(theory, differ from behaviorism)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(theory, differ from law)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(view, differ among people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(view, differ among people)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(theory, differ from behaviorism)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(theory, differ from law)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(theory, differ from guess)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(theology, is defined as)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(theology, be defined)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(view, differ among people)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(functionalism, differ defining)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(theory, differ from law)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(functionalism, differ defining)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(theory, differ from behaviorism)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(functionalism, differ defining)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(theory, differ from guess)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(functionalism, differ defining)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(theology, be defined)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(theology, be defined)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(theology, is defined as)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(theology, is defined as)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(functionalism, differ defining)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining role)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining social role)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, defining role of scientist)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(functionalism, defining social role)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(functionalism, defining role)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(functionalism, defining social role)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(functionalism, defining role)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(functionalism, defining social role)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(functionalism, defining role of scientist)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(functionalism, defining role)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(functionalism, defining role of scientist)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(functionalism, defining role of scientist)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, differ defining)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(functionalism, differ defining)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(theory, differ from guess)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(theory, differ from behaviorism)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(theory, differ from law)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(view, differ among people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(theology, be defined)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(theology, is defined as)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(theory, differ from guess)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(theory, differ from behaviorism)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(theory, differ from law)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(functionalism, differ defining)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(view, differ among people)