functionalism: is useful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents term
Weight: 0.50
, topic
Weight: 0.50
, view
Weight: 0.49
, theory
Weight: 0.46
, approach
Weight: 0.44
Siblings constructivism
Weight: 0.33
, theology
Weight: 0.31
, formalism
Weight: 0.31
, naturalism
Weight: 0.31
, political ideology
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is useful 1.00
is helpful 0.90
be useful in field 0.86
be useful understanding 0.84
be useful as framework 0.81
be more useful than laws 0.79
be important counselling 0.79
be important to geoligists 0.79
be useful as organizing framework 0.77
is interesting 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(approach, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(functionalism, is useful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(theory, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(functionalism, is useful)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(theory, be important counselling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(functionalism, is useful)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(functionalism, is useful)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(topic, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(functionalism, is useful)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(theory, be useful as organizing framework) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(functionalism, is useful)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(theory, be more useful than laws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(functionalism, is useful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(theory, is useful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(theory, be more useful than laws)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(approach, is useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(theory, be useful as organizing framework)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(topic, is interesting)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(theory, be important counselling)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important counselling)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(approach, is useful)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(topic, is interesting)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(theory, is useful)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(theory, be useful as organizing framework)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more useful than laws)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(approach, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(functionalism, is useful)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(theory, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(functionalism, is useful)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(theory, be important counselling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(functionalism, is useful)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(functionalism, is useful)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(theory, be more useful than laws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(functionalism, is useful)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(topic, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(functionalism, is useful)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(theory, be useful as organizing framework) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(functionalism, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(functionalism, is useful)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be useful understanding)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(functionalism, be useful understanding)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be useful understanding)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(functionalism, be useful understanding)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(functionalism, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(theory, be more useful than laws)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(theory, is useful)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(theory, be useful as organizing framework)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(approach, is useful)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(topic, is interesting)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(theory, be important counselling)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(theory, is useful)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(theory, be more useful than laws)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(approach, is useful)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(theory, be useful as organizing framework)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(topic, is interesting)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(functionalism, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(theory, be important counselling)