fungus: be at forest on dead tree

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.66
, microorganism
Weight: 0.65
, germ
Weight: 0.60
, predator
Weight: 0.54
, creature
Weight: 0.54
Siblings salmonella
Weight: 0.63
, mold
Weight: 0.61
, termite
Weight: 0.57
, bacillus
Weight: 0.48
, insect
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at forest on dead tree 1.00
be at dead tree 0.94
grow on dead tree 0.91
be at in forest 0.89
be at forest 0.88
be at pine forest 0.85
be at fall tree 0.83
be at grow on tree 0.82
be at dense forest 0.81
be at woodland 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(creature, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(mold, be at forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(insect, be at in forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(termite, be at forest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(insect, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(insect, be at in forest)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(termite, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(termite, be at forest)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(mold, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(mold, be at forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at dead tree)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fungus, grow on dead tree)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at forest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at pine forest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(fungus, be at forest)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at fall tree)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(fungus, be at dead tree)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at grow on tree)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fungus, be at dead tree)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(fungus, grow on dead tree)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(fungus, be at forest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fungus, grow on dead tree)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at woodland)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(fungus, be at dead tree)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(fungus, be at pine forest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(fungus, be at pine forest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fungus, grow on dead tree)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(fungus, be at grow on tree)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(fungus, be at fall tree)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fungus, be at pine forest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(fungus, be at grow on tree)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(fungus, be at fall tree)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(fungus, be at woodland)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(fungus, be at woodland)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(fungus, be at fall tree)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fungus, be at forest)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(fungus, be at grow on tree)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fungus, be at woodland)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(termite, be at forest)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(insect, be at in forest)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mold, be at forest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(fungus, be at forest on dead tree)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)