fungus: be at petre dish

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.66
, microorganism
Weight: 0.65
, germ
Weight: 0.60
, predator
Weight: 0.54
, creature
Weight: 0.54
Siblings salmonella
Weight: 0.63
, mold
Weight: 0.61
, termite
Weight: 0.57
, bacillus
Weight: 0.48
, insect
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at petre dish 1.00
be at petri dish 0.97
be at culture dish 0.91
be at dessert 0.82
be at salad 0.80
be at soup 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(creature, be at dessert)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(fungus, be at petre dish)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fungus, be at petre dish)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(creature, be at dessert)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at petre dish)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at dessert)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(creature, be at dessert)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(fungus, be at petre dish)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(fungus, be at petre dish)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fungus, be at petre dish)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(fungus, be at petre dish)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(fungus, be at petre dish)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at culture dish)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(fungus, be at petre dish)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(fungus, be at culture dish)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(fungus, be at petre dish)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(fungus, be at petri dish)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fungus, be at petre dish)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fungus, be at culture dish)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(fungus, be at petre dish)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(fungus, be at salad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fungus, be at petre dish)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(fungus, be at petri dish)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(fungus, be at petre dish)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(fungus, be at soup)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(fungus, be at petre dish)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at salad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(fungus, be at petre dish)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at soup)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(fungus, be at petre dish)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(fungus, be at petri dish)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(fungus, be at petre dish)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at petri dish)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(fungus, be at petre dish)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fungus, be at salad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fungus, be at petre dish)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(fungus, be at soup)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(fungus, be at petre dish)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fungus, be at soup)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fungus, be at petre dish)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(fungus, be at salad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(fungus, be at petre dish)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(fungus, be at culture dish)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(fungus, be at petre dish)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(fungus, be at petre dish)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at petre dish)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fungus, be at petre dish)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(fungus, be at petre dish)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at petre dish)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(creature, be at dessert)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(fungus, be at petre dish)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(creature, be at dessert)