fur: be used to trap

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.64
, fabric
Weight: 0.59
, part
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings mink
Weight: 0.51
, wool
Weight: 0.35
, ivory
Weight: 0.34
, meat
Weight: 0.34
, pet food
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to trap 1.00
be used to bait trap 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fur, be used to trap)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(meat, be used to bait trap)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(fur, be used to trap)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(meat, be used to bait trap)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(meat, be used to bait trap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(fur, be used to trap)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(fur, be used to trap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(fur, be used to trap)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(fur, be used to trap)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fur, be used to trap)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(fur, be used to trap)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(fur, be used to trap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fur, be used to trap)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(meat, be used to bait trap)